Love & marriage


True romance

Perhaps you’ve heard the old joke about what women really want from the men in their lives. What every woman secretly fantasizes about, the old joke claims, is to be with two men at the same time: one to cook, and one to clean. Finding a man who shares his feelings or puts down the toilet seat is merely icing on the (wedding?) cake.

What women want?

I’ve never been a huge fan of Valentine’s Day. Yes, it’s nice to take an annual opportunity to do something special for your loved one(s), but a day devoted to the commercial shilling of hearts, chocolate, and roses always seemed a bit tacky to me. When I lived in an all-women’s dorm during my senior year of college, I was dismayed by the sheer amount of misery one simple day could cause. Girls without boyfriends felt dejected, and girls with boyfriends felt a strange need to flaunt whatever their sweetie had gotten them, leading to a huge competition where Boyfriend A’s chocolates paled alongside Boyfriend B’s long-stemmed roses, which were outdone in turn by Boyfriend C’s diamond earrings. Otherwise demur girls turned downright vindictive, it seemed, knowing that the worth of their relationship would be judged (by a jury of their peers, of course) on the basis of what their boyfriend bought. Heaven help those creative and/or impoverished college guys who tried to get away with writing a poem, painting a picture, or singing a song to express their affection: those non-commercial gifts just couldn’t compete in the annual round of Whose Boyfriend Is the Best.

For my Valentine

Tonight, J and I have nothing special planned for Valentine’s Day. Thursday is my usual night for making the weekly drive from Keene to Newton for the weekend, so Reggie and I will arrive at J’s house later tonight just in time for dinner, just as we always do. Instead of eating out, we’ll eat in, Thursday being soup and salad night: something light and easy as we settle into the downside of another work week. When you have a man who cooks and cleans, there’s no need to go out for wining and dining: at this point, heaven sounds like another Thursday night on J’s couch watching Whatever’s On over a couple glasses of wine.

Early tonight, J emailed to ask when I’d be arriving for what he’s termed my “multi-staged” Valentine’s Day gift, adding that he’d told a female friend what he’d gotten me, and she responded, “While it isn’t your ‘traditional’ gift, it could be fun.” Right about now, a man who cooks, cleans, and dreams up nontraditional gifts sounds just right, those college games of Whose Boyfriend Is the Best notwithstanding.

The box on the left is my gift for J, which isn’t exactly a traditional Valentine’s Day gift, either, although it’s gaily masquerading as one. I’ll let you know what it is tomorrow, after J’s unwrapped it…

Seagull

It was mostly rainy in Santa Monica this weekend, so I returned to New England with many memories but not so many photos from a whirlwind weekend revolving around the wedding of friends. At the Friday night rehearsal dinner, Saturday wedding and reception, and Sunday morning brunch, J took hundreds of pictures, illustrating once again his skill at taking non-invasive candid shots that capture the at-ease personality of his subjects. I have no doubt his pictures will be as good and even better than those by the professional photographer who chronicled the wedding and reception.

As for me, I enjoyed making new friends and keeping my camera off during the festivities, my shyness about taking pictures of people giving me ample excuse to enjoy myself rather than hiding behind a camera. In the case of bold seagulls, though, I made an exception, figuring a one-legged bird that literally posed upon approach didn’t see my camera as an invasion of privacy. In Santa Monica, it seems even the seagulls are accustomed to paparazzi.

Clear skies

On Monday morning’s crack-of-dawn taxi ride to the airport, our driver asked if we’d seen any celebrities: apparently, a common topic of conversation in Santa Monica. “No,” J answered, “not a one,” even though several celebrities were in attendance at the wedding: family and friends of the happy couple. To J, a longtime friend of the groom’s parents, the folks in question aren’t celebrities; they’re family. So J and I kept our lips zipped while our cabbie described the time he saw Jessica Simpson and Jennifer Lopez waiting for separate rides outside the same upscale hotel. When it comes to friends who happen to be famous, it doesn’t seem fair to talk and tell.

When you see the softer side of any celebrity–the groom’s famous sister tearing up as she described how happy she is that he’s finally landed with a woman who makes him happy, or a famous friend echoing the same sentiment–you realize the thinness of celebrity skin. On Friday night, I hadn’t met any of J’s LA friends; by the time the rehearsal dinner was over, they all felt like family, the congratulatory speeches and funny stories they shared demonstrating how loved and loving the happy couple truly is. I’ve been to a few non-Hollywood weddings that felt like big performances with expensive flowers, fancy finery, and gourmet meals all screaming “look at us, and be impressed.” This weekend’s wedding felt entirely different. When you are a celebrity, you don’t have to flaunt that status; when you are a friend or relative of a famous person, you know and love their unseen private side, who they really are. Equipped with that knowledge, you have no need or desire to brag.

Sweet Dreams

After Monday morning’s crack-of-dawn taxi ride to the airport, J and I arrived in Boston in time for Monday night’s rush hour; after spending most of Monday night grading papers, yesterday morning I left Newton at the crack-of-dawn in order to teach my 8:00am Expository Writing class here in Keene. Only when I came home from teaching a full day of classes yesterday afternoon did I feel like I’d finally landed, this weekend in Santa Monica coming so close on the heels of the start of classes and my weekend trip to Ohio.

The groom’s famous sister and her equally famous husband jet-set between LA and New York, having apartments on both coasts; as for me, I belong to the Subaru-set, zipping between my workaday apartment here in Keene and my weekend home at J’s place in Newton. Is being an actor, professional athlete, supermodel, or other celebrity more exciting than teaching a handful of face-to-face classes in a quiet New England town or a couple more classes in the anonymous ether of the Internet? Or do they each offer their own challenges and satisfactions?

Perched on the pier

At the wedding reception, after having met and briefly chatted with the groom’s sister on Friday night, we had a longer conversation about her in-progress English degree, something she’s interrupted every time she’s landed a movie or television role. Some might envy the lives and lifestyles of the rich and famous, but as for me, I’m grateful for the peaceful obscurity of life in a quiet New England town and the knowledge that I can take (and teach) college classes without weathering the ogling stares of passing classmates and cab drivers. After learning that I teach online, the groom’s sister peppered me with questions: could online classes give her the schedule flexibility and personal privacy she needs? I suggested they might and offered to answer any questions she might have, proof that even professors have their own hungry public if not an attendant paparazzi. Celebrity skinned or otherwise, we’re all human souls underneath.

Yummy

The third picture above shows the box of goodies, assembled by this company, the bride and groom provided for out-of-town guests. When ours arrived at our hotel, the desk clerk admired the packaging, and I have to say the contents were equally tasty.

Boat watching

You might call this the many-years-after version of this “before.” Long after the excitement of posing for wedding pictures fades, the realities of marriage endure. I wonder how many times this couple has taken Sunday strolls along the harbor, watching cruise boats come and go. How many miles, nautical or otherwise, has this particular couple logged, and through what weathers?

Boat watching

There’s nothing more wholesome than a long-married couple taking a harbor-side walk, unless it’s a grandmother taking her young grandson boat-watching. The shiny novelty of a young couple posing in their wedding finery is one thing, but show me the weathered face of a grandmother or middle-aged couple, and I’ll show you a picture worth more than a thousand words. There’s nothing finer than young love…unless, of course, it’s older love. Marriage is no pleasure cruise; it’s a journey marked by trial and more than a bit of tedium. When I consider the marital math lesson I’ve offered the Almost-Married, it occurs to me that couples who have lasted longer than the almost-thirteen years I was married have that much more wisdom. If the couple in the picture above could give a word of advice to the newlyweds who posed not far from them, what lessons would they share?

These days, I’m more interested in old married couples who have been together forever than I am in new couples just starting out. The excitement of a wedding is fine and good, but what happens when monogamy becomes monotony? The true test of any life, coupled or not, comes on Monday morning with its mundane drudgery. Who is going to do last night’s dishes, and who will take out this week’s trash? It strikes me as downright counter-cultural that one of my favorite things to do with J is grocery shopping on Saturday afternoons: why don’t I “get” the nearly universal message drummed into single folks that dating is about excitement, not mundane chores? And yet, it strikes me that a truly long-term relationship is more about grocery-shopping, laundry-doing, and other household chores than it is about wine, candlelight, and roses. Romance is fine, but unless someone buys the groceries, cooks the meals, and cleans the dishes afterward, how can man or woman live on romance alone?

Cyclists with skyline

Years ago when I saw the blockbuster film Titanic on the big-screen, I remember being struck by one scene near the end of the movie. While everyone else was ooh- and aah-ing over the sexy on-screen chemistry of the movie’s attractive young protagonists, the scene I found the most memorable showed an elderly couple huddled in bed as their cabin filled with water. Too old to race for the lifeboats, the couple had presumably made a pact to go down with the ship together. It’s fine and good for Celine Dion to croon that the female protagonist’s “Heart Will Go On” after her heart-throb suitor ends up dead in the water: it’s easy to love a man you don’t ever have to live with, the novelty of infatuation never having the chance to wear off. But isn’t the truer, truest love the kind that has looked “’til death do us part” in the face and remained faithful?

There’s an oft-quoted Zen saying that says “After the ecstasy, the laundry.” Presumably after the thrill of enlightenment has faded, all that remains are dirty T-shirts and undies. And yet, I’d beg to differ with this oft-quoted saying, or at least the preposition therein. It isn’t that laundry comes after ecstasy; it’s that laundry is ecstasy. If you fully embrace your life with all its tedium and drudgery–if you fully embrace the monotonous routine of the same old spouse as you head off to meditate, again, on the same old cushion–you discover your laundry and your ecstasy are one in the same. What is marital bliss, after all, but the repetition, ’til death do us part, of the same old chores, the same old laundry, and the same old ecstasies?

This is my belated submission for last week’s Photo Friday theme, Wholesome.

Wall flowers

This afternoon I learned via email that a long-time acquaintance I’d lost touch with is getting married. My immediate reaction was the one you’d expect upon hearing good news from a long-time acquaintance: hooray, congratulations, and good luck. Only after I’d had (and expressed) the expected reaction did I notice a tinge of discomfort, not at the fact that this particular acquaintance is getting married, but regarding the topic of marriage itself. After having blogged about Marital Math so recently, I wondered what was it about the engagement of a friend that made me feel a hint of discomfort?

After wondering a moment, I had my a-ha. In the three years since my ex-husband and I separated, none of my close friends has gotten married. The last time I went to a wedding, I was still married, albeit unhappily: fatefully, that wedding happened only a few months before my separation. In the intervening years, I haven’t yet experienced the mixed feelings I’m sure will come the first time I attend a wedding as a divorced woman, and that fact makes me feel slightly uncomfortable.

Phlox

When you attend a wedding as a married person, the rest of the world lets you off the hook. Nobody asks you awkward questions about when you will be tying the knot; the worst that might happen is someone asking when you and your spouse are going to start a family. Intentionally childless, my ex-husband and I were practiced at side-stepping that impertinent question, so weddings weren’t particularly difficult to navigate even though there was always an awkward disconnect between the optimistic, pre-honeymoon happiness of the bride and groom and the settled resignation of our less-idyllic partnership.

When you attend a wedding as an unhappily married person, the rest of the world might let you off the hook, but you are painfully aware of the appearances you’re keeping. At one wedding my ex-husband and I attended, his duties as Best Man provided a socially acceptable reason for us to sit separately and rarely speak with one another; at another wedding, I had to feign a complete lack of coordination to explain why my then-husband and I wouldn’t dance. With most of the attention rightfully devoted to the bride and groom, it’s easy (albeit uncomfortable) to hide your own marital missteps. If someone noticed a tear in my eye while any of a number of couples pledged their undying love to one another, I could have easily said I was shedding tears of joy at their blessed union. Only I (and perhaps my ex-husband) knew I was lamenting the shattering of my long-ago newlywed hopes.

Arrowhead

As a Senior Dharma Teacher in my Zen school, I am technically qualified to perform weddings, but I’ve never filed the appropriate legal paperwork. When I was unhappily married, I didn’t feel like I could honestly offer much wisdom, guidance, or hope to a younger, less-experienced couple; now that I’m happily divorced, I feel I have even less insight to offer, my learned-the-hard-way knowledge of what not to do seeming too cynical to share.

For me, the biggest tragedy of my divorce was the hope I feel it crushed: having deeply and truly believed I was committing to my one and only soul-mate ’til death do us part, now I know how deeply and truly a person can be wrong. In the three-year aftermath of separation and divorce, what I lament isn’t the ending of that relationship but the death of my own innocence. If I could have been so misguided about young love, what makes me think I’ll be any wiser now that I’m older? Was I simply deluded enough to mistake puppy love for the real thing, or is real love far less lasting than either romantics or happily married folks would have you believe?

Purple Loosestrife

In re-reading that post I wrote about the last wedding I attended, what strikes and surprises me is how I managed, even then, to sound as if I believed in marriage and the Great Vows it involves. Even with my heart broken with the reality of my own soon-to-fail marriage, I was able to salvage some sense of what marriage should be:

The message of any wedding and of practice in general, though, is that you try anyway. The thought that you can stay committed to one person for the rest of your life, through sickness and in health, for better and for worse, and in the face of personal and universal vicissitudes is absurdly preposterous: only someone young, idealistic, or in love would dream it possible. But from time immemorial, people have tried it anyway. It isn’t possible to save all beings from suffering–heck, most days I can’t even save myself from suffering–but I try anyway. One of Zen Master Seung Sahn’s favored sayings rings particularly true in this context: “Try, try, try, 10,000 years nonstop.” Or in another Zen turn of phrase, “Fall down six times, get up seven.” The impossibility of the task doesn’t keep us from trying; in fact, the impossibility of the task is the very reason why we try and why we vow to keep trying.

It strikes me as poignantly apt that weddings and the eternal bonds they celebrate are marked with flowers, themselves ephemeral. Although we know a bridal (or any) bouquet is doomed to die, we cherish flowers anyway, determined to appreciate whatever fragile beauty and fleeting fragrance they offer. Perhaps weddings should be celebrated with a similar kind of realistic romanticism. Death and the breaking of vows sometimes come prematurely, but in the meantime we decide to love and cherish as much as we can, while we can. If our decisions prove misguided, we return to an optimistic wish that hope, although capable of being crushed, ultimately can recover, adapt, and persevere until death.

Marital Bliss Bar

On Saturday night, several girlfriends and I met in Portsmouth, NH to go shopping, people-watching, and dining. While browsing upscale kitchenwares and funky jewelry, I spotted a stack of Marital Bliss chocolate bars, each of them divided in “half” as shown above. Chuckling, I pointed them out to my girlfriends and continued browsing. A girl, of course, can never have too much chocolate, upscale kitchenwares, or funky jewelry, but I wasn’t seriously in the market for anything: just looking.

North Church Steeple

After we’d stopped shopping and started deciding where to eat, I got thinking about those chocolate bars and the Marital Bliss they presumably promise. Perhaps I was still contemplating the thoughts on growing a 20-something-year marriage that Beth posted last week, or perhaps I’m still feeling contemplative in the aftermath of the three year anniversary of my separation. Whatever the reason for my having serious thoughts about a chocolate bar designed as a gag gift, it seemed I wasn’t the only one in Portsmouth on Saturday night thinking about marriage. As my friends and I considered and then rejected one restaurant for our Girls’ Night Out, we encountered the members of a beer-soaked bachelor party milling on a street corner, the guest of honor clearly identifiable by an actual ball and chain tethered to his foot. Once we’d decided upon and gotten settled at another restaurant, we discovered the table next to ours was the site of a bachelorette party, the guest of honor sporting a fake tiara and pacifier-sized toy diamond ring. On a summer Saturday night in Portsmouth, it seems the Almost-Marrieds & Friends come out in droves.

Sitting next to a party of marriage-minded 20-somethings, I had to wonder what wisdom our table might offer theirs. I’m a 30-something; my two girlfriends are 40-somethings. Two of us are divorced after a dozen years of marriage apiece; one of us is a veteran dater. I’m not a math wizard, but I couldn’t help but think that we three more-than-20-somethings had more relationship experience–and certainly more firsthand knowledge of marriage, separation, and divorce–than the dozen 20-somethings sitting next to us. Collectively, the women sitting at my table surely know something–surely I know something–the blushing bride-to-be with her fake tiara and toy diamond ring hasn’t yet learned.

And so here it is, little sister: wisdom learned the hard way. Don’t listen to me: listen to the chocolate bar. When it comes to Marital Bliss, it ain’t about 50/50.

Pleasant & Congress Streets

At first blush, Bride-To-Be, my words might seem bitter: dark chocolate that’s far less sweet than what you’re used to. But when it comes to relationships, calculating percentages almost always leads to keeping score. As soon as you replace the sexual thrill of scoring with the judgmental act of keeping score, you’ve taken what an old friend of mine called the Turning Point Toward Death. The honeymoon’s really over when you stop appreciating and being grateful for what your mate is and does and instead begin tallying what your mate isn’t and doesn’t do.

Because no two people are perfectly matched, no relationship can constantly and consistently operate on a strict 50/50 basis. One of you will make more money than the other. One of you will do more housework, and one of you will work longer hours. One of you will be better at managing household finances, one of you will be a better cook, and one of you will be neater and better organized. If you have children, one of you will spend more time than your partner does changing diapers, reading bedtime stories, and chauffeuring youngsters to music lessons and sporting events.

In a word, in any given category of marital housekeeping, one of you will rate 60% and the other 30%; in some other category, one of you will score 10% and the other 75%. None of this adds up, of course, to a perfect 100%, and it certainly isn’t 50/50. In the real world, the perfect math of 50/50 is an elusive ideal that couples can strive toward, but expect to be disappointed and be ready to be tolerant when the numbers simply don’t add up.

In my own, admittedly failed marriage, my ex-husband and I were practiced perfectionists when it came to keeping score, and the result was seething resentment and divorce. An English major with several adjunct teaching jobs can’t possibly match the income of a software engineer. Although I tried to compensate by doing as much around the house as my more-flexible work schedule allowed, the value of all my cooking, cleaning, errand-running, and other to-doing never seemed to equal the paycheck my ex-husband earned from a “real job.” When it came to making financial decisions, I never felt I’d invested enough (metaphorically or literally) to make my voice count. Although my ex-husband remembers our deliberations differently, I clearly recall the moment when our decision to buy a house was made by his definitive proclamation, “I make the money, so I get to make the decisions.” Money is one way to decide who’s contributing more than 50% to a given relationship, but it’s not the only factor worth considering. As soon as you start doing the Marital Math of calculating who’s worth what, the damage has already been done.

Fountain

Agreeing to split wage-earning and household tasks 50/50 is a noble goal, but the calculus of trade-offs can be tricky. Does the “worth” of staying home to raise a child equal or surpass the “worth” of pulling in a full-time paycheck? If a stay-at-home partner manages a frugal household, does Ben Franklin’s motto about a penny saved being a penny earned truly enter into home economics? In the premarital and honeymoon phases of a relationship, it’s easy to think you and your partner are on the same page when it comes to the division of labor, management of finances, and other mundane issues that encourage score-keeping…but as soon as one of you starts wondering if the other is pulling her or his weight, there’s trouble in paradise.

Pulling your weight in a relationship is essential, but so too is the realization that few partners weigh the same. In any relationship, there will be countless times when one partner will have to use her or his strength to compensate for the other’s weakness, and in any long-term relationship, there will be times (in sickness and in health) when one partner is partly or even wholly incapacitated, relying even more upon a helping hand. If you’re keeping track of Who’s Helping Whom and How Much, there will be times when you wonder why you (or your partner) is doing more of the relational heavy-lifting. In my experience, this line of thought is a one-way fast-lane to unhappiness and domestic discord.

When it comes to Marital Math, I learned my lesson the hard way, having been stumped by a problem I couldn’t solve. On the other side of marriage and divorce, I have this to say to any Almost-Married looking for advice: splitting things 50/50 is a lovely ideal, but in a real marriage, you shouldn’t count anything but your blessings. Instead of keeping track of your and your partner’s percentages, shouldn’t each of you agree to put 100% into your relationship no matter what?


UPDATE: In response to my question about what she learned from her brief first marriage, Beth posted a follow-up to her original post on how to grow a healthy marriage. As much as I appreciated Beth’s original post, I think her follow-up list is even better!

Cabbage butterfly on goldenrod

It’s been three years since I announced a week of blog-silence: my response to my then-husband’s moving out, the first step to our eventual divorce. In the immediate aftermath of our separation, the last thing I wanted to do was talk about a decision that the two of us had discussed to the point of madness; contemplating the next-step called divorce, the last thing I wanted to do three years ago was talk to virtual strangers about the failure of my marriage.

Reddening witch hazel

It’s been three years, now, that I’ve lived on my own: three years that I’ve survived being separated and then divorced. Although I don’t believe there is a strict time-line for heartache, three years seems nicely symbolic to me. If I can (and have) survived three years on my own, I tell myself, there’s nothing I can’t survive. One of the things that kept me in a marriage that had in many ways already died was an insecurity about living on my own: having married straight out of college, I’d never lived without a parent, college scholarship, or spouse to support me. When I was an under-employed graduate student married to a software engineer with a “real job,” I was terrified that I’d never be able to feed, shelter, and otherwise support myself on an adjunct instructor’s salary. It wasn’t until my ex-husband left that I discovered I’m much more resilient than I’d ever imagined.

Goldenrod

Three years later, I still feel a thrill of self-reliant satisfaction whenever I pay bills with money I myself have earned; three years later, I still feel that weathering divorce is the most significant, character-forming experience I’ve ever had. Going to grad school taught me how to be a scholar; finishing a PhD taught me how to keep chip, chip, chipping at a task that seemed impossibly daunting when I started. But had I never divorced, I would never have known how strong I can be when tested. Marriage taught me about the art of compromise and the delicate dance of argument, but it wasn’t until my ex-husband left that I learned how strong a solitary soul can be. In the aftermath of divorce, I’ve learned how to pay my own way, make my own decisions, and face my own consequences. After surviving the aftershock of admitting the failure of the longest, most serious relationship I’ve ever attempted, I’m learning the most valuable lesson of all: self-forgiveness.

Leaf & bud

Earlier this week, while talking to a friend who’s divorce is fresher than mine, I found myself listing the positive gifts I gleaned from almost-thirteen years of marriage. If I hadn’t married, I would have never started practicing Zen, moved to New England, moved into a Zen Center, or briefly owned a house. If I hadn’t married, I’d probably have never finished graduate school, driven several times across the country, started a blog, or briefly led a Zen Group. It’s not that I’m incapable of achieving these things on my own–if nothing else, the past three years have taught me that there’s nothing I can’t do if I put my mind to it. But having been married, I was pushed to do things I probably wouldn’t have envisioned doing on my own. Having been married, I left the predictable world of life back in Ohio and did things the rest of my family would never have dreamed I’d do.

It’s easy to look back on past mistakes and wish you’d never made them: had I known at age 21 what I know now, would I have gotten married? That answer is impossible to know. What I do know, though, is that I’m happy now for what I went through then. At the time as I was muddling my way through a marriage that never quite fit, I couldn’t detect anything remotely resembling a plan. Now in retrospect, I don’t see a plan, but I do see Providence. By fate, chance, or grace, the places I’ve been, people I’ve known, and things I’ve done have brought me to this exact spot, and three years after separation, this exact spots feels just right.

Blueberries

On Tuesday morning, I walked Reggie at Goose Pond, a soothing place I’ve walked countless times over the past four years, both before and after my separation. As much as the particulars of my personal life have changed, it’s good to know that water, trees, and stone remain the same, the blueberries that are beginning to ripen this year tasting the same as they always do. I suppose the beginning of August is as good a time as any to start a new life, the separation between Then and Now ripening along with late summer berries, flowering fields, and the first reddening leaves of almost-autumn. If any day can be the beginning of a self-reliant life, why not begin afresh when Nature is at the height of her lush and fecund glory?

Goldenrods

Four canoes

I haven’t been in a canoe since I owned one, back when I was a married homeowner with a pickup truck, shotgun, and other accoutrements of New Hampshire domesticity that got jettisoned when my ex-husband and I downsized from a three-bedroom house in Hillsboro for a two-bedroom apartment in Keene. As the end of July approaches, it’s been almost three years since my ex-husband and I separated, which means I’ve been living in Keene without a canoe for four years: one year married, and three years on my own.

Kayaks at ready

When my ex-husband and I bought our flat-bottomed canoe, it cost $500 from a sportsman’s store stocked with hunting and fishing gear, and the salesman waiting on us was flummoxed by our insistence that we wanted a canoe simply for floating on quiet rivers and still ponds. “You mean you won’t be fishing or hunting with it?” he asked incredulously. When my ex-husband and I sold our canoe, we all but gave it to a young couple who couldn’t believe the $50 price tag it bore the first day of our house-clearing garage sale. “Are you sure you want to sell it for so little?” the woman asked. “It’s so nice, and it looks like new.”

Canoes on the Charles

Truth be told, we used that canoe only a handful of times in the several years we owned it: once on a flat stretch of the Contoocook River in Antrim, and several times on a quiet, secluded pond in Henniker. Once, we’d canoed with Reggie; the other times, it was just the two of us trying to make a go of it in a vessel that stumped salesman at the sportsman’s store had called a “divorce boat,” the delicate, cooperative navigation of which stresses even the best partnerships. The memory of selling, cheaply, our “divorce boat” to a young couple who looked active, enthusiastic, and happy is something I’ve remembered fondly over the years: I’d like to think they took the time and care to take it out of the garage more than we did, and I’d like to think their relationship, unlike ours, has managed to stay afloat.

Setting out

Today as a companion and I watched paddlers, singly and coupled alike, making a go of it on the Charles River in Newton, Massachusetts, I had no desire to try to prove myself (or test any relationship) by demonstrating my presumed prowess with canoe, pickup truck, shotgun, or any other accoutrement. If you and your partner are heading in different directions, or if you and your partner are long-accustomed to competing and keeping score with one another, any vessel becomes a “divorce boat,” your relationship being unsafe at any speed. In retrospect, my marriage was on the rocks long before we bought a house in New Hampshire or a canoe at a sportsman’s store stocked with hunting and fishing gear; in retrospect, the only domestic accoutrement I needed then was the courage to leap out of the boat called “marriage” and into the calm, buoyant water of “happily after.”

Shady spot, Keene, NH

I woke up this morning feeling quiet and contemplative, in a mood for taking stock. Last night I met with a financial advisor: after years of living from paycheck to paycheck like a typical college student, I’ve decided it’s high time for me to get my accounts in order and start thinking about the rest of my life. This practice of looking at numbers–income and expenses, cash-flow and assets–invariably leads to questions about value: how am I currently living my life, and how do I want to live my life in the future?

There’s more than money fueling this morning’s contemplation. I’m in the heart of July and rounding the curve towards August, a personally significant time for me. Inwardly attuned to anniversaries, I’m mindful that it’s been two years since my ex-husband and I moved to Keene in July of 2003 and nearly one year since my ex and I separated last August. For me, July and August are irrevocably tinged with the taste of transitions: comings and goings. After living nearly a year on my own here in Keene, it seems natural that I’m inwardly taking stock: how’s it going, and are my emotional accounts in order?

Vase with flowers, Keene, NH

In revisiting this time last year, this morning I remembered the awful experience of those in-between days, the days of late July when I knew in my bones I was moving toward divorce but didn’t yet have the courage to say it. Last July I’d had several sessions with a counselor who observed the things I was saying about my marriage were nearly identical to what she regularly hears from women some 15 years older than me: women in their fifties who feel they’ve lost themselves in marriage and childrearing. You’re still young, the counselor remarked. It’s not too late to start over. When asked what it was that kept me in my marriage, I described the guilt I felt over leaving, especially right on the heels of finishing my PhD: wouldn’t it look like I’d used my husband, that there was a causal connection between reaching a goal gained through his support and then cutting the ties?

Lush and weathered, Keene, NH

Again that counselor said something that brought everything into sharp focus. Would I want to remain married to someone who stayed with me only out of guilt? Whether or not I liked the place I found myself, that’s where I’d come. I could either have the courage to say “Here’s where I’m at, and here’s where I’m going,” or I could agree to continue coasting, without a plan, in a direction I knew wasn’t good for anyone.

This morning as I began tallying my emotional accounts–nearly an entire fiscal (and physical) year on my own–I dipped into my blog archives to see how well I’d hidden what was really going on in my emotional life last year. What a fortuitous accident, then, to discover that this entry was what I’d written exactly one year ago today. Underneath my admiration for my Phoenix Friends who’d reinvented themselves after divorce was an unspoken realization that I needed to follow them. One year ago today, I looked at those who had been through the turnstile of divorce and wondered how they did it. Today one year later, I realize I’ve been through my own ’stile and survived, having learned by doing.

Reflective self-portrait

I just checked the calendar to confirm what my soul suspected: it’s been almost exactly six months since I announced to the blogosphere that I’d separated from my now-ex husband. Attuned to the predictable rhythms of my psyche, I’ve been bracing myself for this next stage: the aftershock, that weird, vulnerable, emotionally tenuous place where you feel something surprising struggling to be born from the apparent tranquility of acceptance.

Reflection among flowers

Much of the post-traumatic coping in the aftermath of divorce, I’m learning, happens subconsciously, roiling under the surface like an emotional leviathan. On the surface, I’m doing swimmingly: I go to work, I teach my classes, I pay my bills and walk the dog. I shop and sightsee, take and post pictures, and spend time with friends old and new. In a word, I have a life, and I love it: never have I regretted leaving a relationship that was dying and (frankly) taking me with it. And yet at the same time, I’m only gradually coming to grips with the repercussions of living my life with a healing wound: scar-tissue of the soul.

One morning last week–the morning before my ex-husband’s birthday, in fact–I woke before my alarm with a panicked startle: “I’m divorced!” It was as if the enormity of the split had suddenly dawned on me, like I’ve been walking around in blithe disregard of what dire fate has actually befallen me. For a moment, I thought I’d burst into hot panicked tears right there in my bed, the sun still hours from appearing. It wasn’t that I missed or regretted “losing” my ex-husband since for several weeks now I’ve had occasional, fragmented, and barely remembered dreams where he’s appeared unannounced at my doorstep, in my car, or in my apartment, sudden and uninvited. In each of these dreams, I’ve felt the same sickening emotions that led to separation: the cringing worthlessness I felt being married to someone whose expectations I felt perpetually doomed to under-satisfy.

Mirror shopping

No, that morning’s panic had nothing to do with my ex-husband but everything to do with me, with the inexplicable shame I feel being “a divorced woman.” As much as I never fit the role of what a good wife (whatever that is) is supposed to be, I struggle even more with seeing myself as being the kind of person (whatever that is) who would divorce.

I never thought I had a judgmental view of divorce; I’ve never been conscious of looking down on someone because their marriage didn’t work out. But in my own case, I’m gradually coming to realize how much guilt and shame I’ve been carrying, a seething cauldron of psychological poison bubbling just under the emotional surface. My marriage failed…I failed. I’ll always be tainted with that irredeemable flaw: I’m a divorced woman, my first marriage having failed.

Reflective lamp fixture

It’s as if I’ve long labored under a subconscious notion of purity: in a day and age when more folks than not, it seems, have at least one failed marriage under their belt, I felt aloof and different: pure. Marrying young, before I had much experience with the dating scene, I could pretend I was a wife from a different era, pure and virginal, someone who could years later boast of having been married for 30, 40, 50 years: a boast as precious as gold in a tawdry and tarnished time.

Instead of being able to boast late in life that I’d made my marriage work–that I’d kept my sacred vows and successfully forsook all others for as long as we both did live–now I’m forever besmirched with human imperfection. Divorce. Another way of spelling failure, quitter, breaker-of-hearts, starting with one’s own. Although I’d never lob these hideous invectives at another soul, they stick so perversely when I toss them on myself. Married as a good Catholic girl who really believed those priests who said Marriage is a Sacrament, I never again will be so young or so naive. Nope, now I’m Used Goods–tainted–a second-hand car that’s been ’round the block more than a couple of times and is showing the usual wear and tear. The old gray mare just ain’t what she used to be: I’ve gone from being not-so-good as a good-little-wife-wannabe to being exactly what the status on my car insurance says: once Separated, now Divorced. Not whole but severed: patched but forever broken.

Mirror, mirror

Lately, on scattered occasions, I’ve had bouts of panic about being alone. These aren’t emotional feelings of loneliness: this isn’t a matter of missing my ex-husband or yearning for a man’s companionship. Instead, I’ve felt occasional panicked feelings of vulnerability, as if I were by nature a herd animal–antelope or gazelle–that suddenly has been singled out from the herd, alone and defenseless, as a hungry leopard approaches, lean and swift. I am a newly divorced woman living on my own some 700 miles from my closest kin. If I slipped in my bathtub, who would notice? If I fell victim to some accident or disaster, who would care?

These are, of course, the illogical questions of a frightened mind. Simply being coupled doesn’t save you from accident or mortality, and even while I was married, I spent a large portion of my free-time alone, preferring solitude or the company of friends to that of a spouse from whom I felt increasingly estranged. But panic, I’ve come to believe, is a telling symptom; in my meditation practice, I’ve learned that panic, like a hiker’s double-blaze, often preceeds a marked and unexpected turn. Sometimes panic is the overture to a more lasting trial; sometimes facing panic–the imaginary beasties under one’s bed–is how we prepare to face the long haul of meaningful change and new beginnings.

Mirror shopping

For in the very midst of these dark emotions that churn and roil beneath the surface, clarity and strength arises unbidden. This past week I said goodbye to a friendship that had gone sour, an acquaintance I deeply admire but who had become increasingly difficult for me to deal with. I feel no hard feelings toward this friend: I just reached a point where I no longer had the energy to second-guess another’s actions and motivations. After having spent too much energy of late apologizing for ways I’d unwittingly offended simply by being myself, I reached the same point in friendship that I’d ultimately reached in marriage. Sometimes quitting is a necessary thing: sometimes you simply need to say “enough” rather than continuing to push a stone up a slippery hill.

This past weekend at the Providence Zen Center, several old friends had not yet heard of my divorce, leaving me to explain (awkwardly) the current state of my love life when faced with the seemingly innocuous greeting, “So, how are you guys?” Now that I’m no longer half of “you guys,” I stand alone in the face of people’s questions: “My husband and I divorced in November, and I’m doing fine.” As awkward as it is to deal with the wide range of emotions such an announcement evokes, it ultimately feels good to answer the question honestly, no longer needing to pretend my marriage was something it wasn’t. Instead of clinging to some boastful notion of purity, it’s a relief to acknowledge that both people and relationships change and grow, that even crushed and shattered souls can ultimately find the strength to move on.

Yes, I’m still obsessed with reflective photography, having uploaded several of these images to the Mirror Project. You can find my past submissions here, or you can check out a random assortment of Mirror Project submissions.

Cheshire County Courthouse

In less than an hour, I will leave my apartment to walk down foggy streets to the courthouse here in Keene for my date with Judge John P. Arnold. I will arrive early; I will meet somewhere in the hallway with my lawyer. And at 8:30 am, in the matter of Lorianne Schaub and Christopher Schaub, Judge Arnold will oversee a 10 minute Uncontested Divorce Hearing.

All this will occur today, October 26, exactly one week before what would have been Chris and my 13th anniversary, a timing (and numerology) whose irony I fully realize. I don’t know whether to laugh, cry, or sit down and sigh with relief.

I suspect that over the course of the day, I’ll do some semblance of all three, potentially (if possible) at the same time.

Cheshire County Courthouse

I’ve been nervously awaiting this court-date for months now, ever since Chris moved out at the beginning of August. On the one hand I’ve been looking forward to the closure I hope the official paperwork will bring; on the other, I’ve been on pins and needles fearing that some last minute snafu will derail the deal. Emotionally, I’m moving on past the divorce; on a practical level, our belongings and assets have been fairly divided and we each are moving on with our lives. But something as simple as a court-date and a slip of paper is the one last tie keeping everything “in process.”

Until 8:30 am today, when there will be nothing (legally) keeping either of us tied to any of that.

Cheshire County Courthouse

I’ve vowed not to cry at the hearing…but yesterday when I strolled past the courthouse, dog in tow, just to acclimate myself to the place where this all is going to happen, I admit I got misty-eyed. This is where it happens: this is where Lorianne Schaub will somehow legally–somehow magically–revert to being Lorianne DiSabato. Yes, over the next weeks and months I’ll be going through the paperwork hassle of changing my name, again: a symbolic new me, one who is (I hope) both older and wiser than the old me. I’m not the same person I was when I last was Lorianne DiSabato…but I’m certainly no longer who I was when I first became Lorianne Schaub, either.

In the end, I just want to be Lorianne: Lorianne who will be strong enough not to cry during a 10 minute hearing, and Lorianne who will have the courage to sit on the steps outside this very public courthouse and bawl her eyes out if that’s what she feels like. Either way, at the end of the day, I’ll be Lorianne, whoever that is. And at the end of the day, I trust that being Lorianne, simply Lorianne, will be enough for today and tomorrow and the future that unrolls from here.

Next Page »