Yesterday I went color-collecting. Although I always notice shape and color when I walk, sometimes I consciously pick a single hue and then seek to notice everywhere I see it: a kind of color scavenger hunt. Yesterday I took three separate jaunts around the campus at Keene State College, the first time noticing royal blue, the second time noticing forest green, and the third time returning with a camera to capture my favorite finds.
This is, of course, a silly game to wile away time, but then again what isn’t? If we’re going to travel the territory of our mundane lives, we might as well notice the neighbors. All this time I’ve been teaching at Keene State, I’ve never noticed that forest green is the preferred color for utility and maintenance doors, just as in the New England countryside the same shade of green is preferred for window shutters. I don’t know who decided, or when, that green is a utilitarian color: presumably it wears well, fades nicely, and is unobtrusive. I’m similarly unsure about whoever it was who thought it necessary to put bright blue edges on deep green picnic tables, but I’m surely glad they did: it’s a combination I find cheering, like a blue-eyed lake set in an verdant valley.
Among the congratulatory comments I’ve received from friends, family, and perfect strangers are those tinged with envy: how wonderful to be able to live the life of the mind. I suppose I understand this sentiment. For many of us, our undergraduate college years were carefree ones, days spent strolling grassy campuses fringed with comforting brick and stable stone facades. Nestled in pastoral green, we navigated the fragile transition between youth and adulthood, our wildest carousings being watched by the solicitous eye of an institution paid to operate in loco parentis. Although we sometimes resented the intrusion of residence assistants, professors, and advisors, the fact that they served as a kind of human safety net gave us the freedom to think, play, and rebel as we tested the bounds of grown-up freedom in a setting sheltered from the “real world.”
So I understand the sentiment of those who see a career in academia as being an extension of their carefree college days, a way to spend the rest of their lives holed away with books and libraries and lush green campuses. I can certainly think of worse ways to spend the rest of my life than teaching young minds on campuses dotted with green doorways.
But ultimately I don’t want a life of the mind. If forced to choose between body and mind, I’d choose the body time and again. Although I respect Ralph Waldo Emerson for his mind, I love Henry Thoreau for his feet: what Emerson thought and wrote, Thoreau walked and lived. How heart-breaking a loss it would have been for Thoreau to have wasted his life as a grad student or college professor holed away in a library study carrel. Thoreau, like Wordsworth before him, considered the outdoors as his study, and theirs is the example I want to emulate.
And so I don’t want to live a life of the mind but a life of the foot. Like Thoreau I want to travel a great deal in Keene, and like Whitman I want to wile my earthly time as a flaneur, one of the roughs. Keene isn’t Concord, and it certainly isn’t New York, but it will do. At my dissertation defense, one of my advisors asked me what sorts of places best lend themselves to nature writing, and my glib answer is nevertheless true: All of them. Given the choice between the real world and the life of the mind, I choose the real and the actual, the “Contact!” that Thoreau climbed Mount Ktaadn to find. Whitman himself knew it was possible to be the poet of the body as well as the soul, and Kerouac’s character of Japhy Ryder summed up in a single sentence my personal life credo:
- The closer you get to real matter, rock air fire and wood, boy, the more spiritual the world is.
Even Emerson admitted that books are for the scholar’s idle times, and I’d agree. A life of the mind might pay the bills, but a life of the body is what feeds the soul. So today I’ll walk to the library, drop off another stack of dusty tomes, then keep walking. The world is full of green doors yet unnoticed.
Apr 8, 2004 at 10:57 am
I interrupt reading your enjoyable-as-always post to make this trivial comment: “to wile away time” should be “to while away time,” shouldn’t it?
See: http://www.quinion.com/words/qa/qa-whi3.htm: “Historically and formally, while is the right answer.” But this source also says: “the idea in to wile away time was to steal time illicitly from one’s proper duties,” so maybe you used that form intentionally?
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 11:05 am
Funny how you interpreted that statement. I would have thought that the alternative to “life of the mind” would be one of manual labour, as opposed to academia. Though we could surely debate what is manual labour by today’s standards. Does it include data entry, hairstyling, grocery clerking? Tax accounting, office management, programming? I’d suggest that it does, and that what people are thinking of when they imagine the world of academia as being one “of the mind” isn’t an adolescent desire to return to the idyllic and carefree days of college (which for many kids I knew when I was in college involved working two jobs while holding down a full course load– not very carefree), but a desire to escape a mindnumbingly banal and chillingly unfulfilling job.
Of course, I don’t know your family and friends, but I can guess a little about the strangers. 🙂
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 11:16 am
Lin! There’s nothing I love more than a good word debate! I wasn’t aware that “while” was more proper than “wile,” although I guess it makes sense. I did, however, have a semi-conscious thought connecting “wiling away time” with being wily (and thus, by extension, Wile E. Coyote, but I digress…) Anyhow, I like the subtle pun of “wiling” as a form of trickery or thievery, so I’ll stick with “wile.” Since none other than Fanny Burney is listed as being one of the first Brits to use this spelling, I figure it’s good enough for me!
Tonio, you’re right about the “usual” sense of “life of the mind”: working a white collar job certainly beats digging ditches. The folks I had in mind, though, are mostly themselves students (undergrad or Masters level) who see getting a PhD as being away to stay on campus/in college forever: a form of escape. Most of these folks haven’t juggled the kinds of jobs you’re talking about, so they see a life of being a “professional student” as being better than work…
I certainly have no beef against the life of the mind: I’m too skinny/scrawny to dig ditches, and at the end of the day I’m pretty damn cerebral. What I balk at, though, is the stereotype of the pasty, eggheaded scholar: I think the life of the mind/body is much more robust than that.
Again, Thoreau is my personal hero: a brainy, Harvard-educated guy who could out-walk anyone, build a house, row a boat, climb mountains, etc. A man of both brain & brawn.
Thanks for the comments!
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 11:53 am
You concluded that “The world is full of green doors yet unnoticed.” I would add: “And waiting to be opened.”
Eric Hoffer surely lived the life of the mind (in the fullest sense) while every day working with his hands as a longshoreman. Manaul labor and ideas should not be construed as opposed to each other; we just can’t make the transition sometimes. Nor is freedom necessarily opposed to imprisonment, but that’s a different issue.
Lorianne, I am really glad to see you back walking and bringing us all the keen images and their many hues.
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 12:12 pm
A life of the body also feeds the kind of writing you love to do…surely there will be wonderful books flowing from that experience!
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 12:13 pm
Sigh… oh yes, the carefree days of being an undergraduate. Those memories definitely factored into my decision to quit my job and go to grad school. Just as you say, the reality of graduate school is very different than those undergrad days. And yes, I agree, I’d choose a life of bodily movement over living/working within my mind — which is another reason I opted to go to grad school. I imagined days out in the field rather than behind a desk. Well, I get about one day a month out in the “field”, which is Santa Monica Bay for me. I’m not sure if that means more field days than my previous desk job with the National Park Service. Fortunately, riding horses gets me out of my mind and into my body nearly every day. Two days ago I got out of my mind and left on my butt in the sand. Maybe a little mind is necessary 🙂
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 12:18 pm
I get what you’re saying now, Lorianne.
I guess I’m guilty of projecting. I wasn’t really making a distinction between white, pink, and blue collar work. Rather the opposite. In one respect, they’re all the same: we don’t use our “minds.” The envy, if I look at my own, would come from the recognition, shared by me and many of my peers (probably almost everyone I know), that when it comes down to it, we’re really nothing but trained monkeys, and the only people using their minds in any capacity in our organisations (in human resources, conflict management, etc), are doing it specifically to figure out more and more efficient ways to keep us from using ours.
Naturally, from that viewpoint, it isn’t really a “life of the mind” we’d envy so much as a life which asked us to “use the mind.”
But yes, it’s just me and my envy speaking. 😉
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 6:18 pm
I really liked the idea of the color scavenger hunt. I worry that with each passing year, I notice less and less. You remind me that to be vigilant and pay attention.
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 6:45 pm
I’m very glad I’ve found this page. That was a wonderful essay and I get a vague sense that you did not spend too much time preparing it. A very truthful and leading essay…I’ll be making a habit of this site.
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 8:29 pm
No need to split your body and mind. The mind exists throughout the body – in our nerves and senses, in the cells of our gastrointestinal tracts (which many doctors call the second brain).
As your walk shows, you can exercise them together. They are one.
I once had a friend who wanted to give up a life of the mind and trade it in for dance. I warned him that this would be impossible, since dance requires so much exertion from the mind (to control muscles, to understand poetics of movement …). He was actually trading in a split life for a life of full engagement. So he would still live a life of the mind, just differently.
(ps but if I believed a choice were necessary, I would choose body, too … like you, I would wander as a flaneur… be the psychogeographer, always)
LikeLike
Apr 8, 2004 at 10:09 pm
Tom, I agree that the mind/body split is artificial: Whitman himself felt that the greatest poetry was the natural speech of the working man. I’ve been sorely aware, though, that this past month or so I’ve gotten out of balance, spending too much time inside poring over books & not enough time outside walking. I much prefer the latter & feel it contributes greatly to the former.
Denny, I agree that body, mind, and *writing* are one of a piece. I promise you’ll be among the first to hear when anything I write is published! 😉
Corrina, your comment about how the “reality” of grad school differs from our expected ideal is *exactly* what I had in mind as I was writing this entry. The envious folks I was referring to think that grad school is a time for leisurely reading books you love…and it is, sometime. But most of the time it’s drudge-work, and the “life of the mind” involves a lot of poor body habit: too little sleep, exercise, relaxation. I think I walk for the same reason you ride horses: it brings us back to our senses.
Tonio, we’re *all* guilty of projecting! 😉 When I hear people who want to go to grad school, I want to shake some sense into them: “This is just as grueling & drudge-like as what you’re doing now!” But of course, at least grad school *ends* and (hopefully) leads to something better, unlike a dead-end job. I just hope prospective grad students realize the huge commitment that something like a PhD entails: it’s more like masochism than escapism! 😉 But that’s simply me projecting my restlessness over all the time I’ve spent indoors this past month or so…
Trey, I have to give credit where credit is due. The idea for the color scavenger hunt comes from Natalie Goldberg’s _Writing Down the Bones_, although she doesn’t use that name for it. But it’s an exercise I got from her book & use every semester with my Expository Writing students.
Hank! So nice to “meet” you: I’m glad you found my site, too! Thank you for your kind words, and I look forward to getting to know you as we brush elbows in the blogosphere… 😉
Karrie, I’m loving the term “psychogeographer.” Yeah, that’s it exactly! And I agree about the mind/body connection, which is exactly why this past sedentary month has been so frustrating to me: how I would have preferred to be walking & writing rather than just writing!
Thanks, everyone, for the fabulous comments: you guys are great! 😉
LikeLike