I remember reading somewhere–I’ve forgetten precisely where–that Virginia Woolf once compared her journal to a junky drawer filled with random bits. The purpose of a junk drawer, of course, is to stash things you don’t need now but might need later. And thus this analogy between journaling and junk-hoarding is an apt one. As a long-time journaler and newly obsessive photographer of abandoned places, I guess I know junk. I’ve seen junk, and it is I.
When you practice meditation long enough, you realize that your own mental junk drawer is infinitely expansive: everything and everything can fit inside, and does. In the middle of meditation, for no apparent reason, a memory from your childhood will bubble into consciousness, followed by an argument you had yesterday, followed by an intensely detailed sensory image of a double-pepperoni deep-dish pizza. These thoughts and images come and go regardless of anything you try to do to control them. One thing that Zen teaches you is to receive this incessant junky flow without judgment or discrimination: don’t cling to any thought, and don’t push any thought away.
My writing students–particularly my adult writing students–are sometimes shocked by the level of comfort I have when it comes to sharing my own “raw” writing and the presumably “private” thoughts it contains. Some people like to hide their junk drawers, thinking that others will judge them poorly based on the random assortment of trauma and pain they contain. I, for one, believe that we all share pretty much the same traumas and pains, so showing you mine is not much different than looking at yours. Writing in this sense is like getting naked in front of other naked people: once you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all, albeit in slightly different shapes, sizes, and colors. But if you’ve ever spent time with dancers, you know that people who are intimately familiar with their own bodies are typically unashamed by nakedness, seeing their bodies as the comfortable tools of their trade.
Thus, just as I was once shocked to watch a woman dancer I’d recently met start undressing in the middle of a mixed-company conversation, my writing students are sometimes shocked when I read some scribbled bit from my journal, the ink still wet from my pen. “What do you mean, you have a missing sister?” “Do you often feel like killing yourself?” “Doesn’t it bother you that your parents have never visited you since you moved from Ohio?” These are, I suppose, pertinent questions: I suppose normal people would be troubled by missing siblings, self-destructive impulses, or seemingly indifferent parents. In the chaotic clutter that is my mind, though, these are simply random bits, pieces that are there but only occasionally considered: part of the unending stream of thoughts, they neither forgotten nor dwelled upon. Like blandly ambient music, such thoughts are neither irritating nor particularly likeable. Instead, they simmer just under the surface of consciousness, appearing every now and then: oh, you again?
Writing, like meditation, is about befriending your junk, or at least tolerating it. With pen in hand, I do the same sort of thing I do when sitting on a meditation cushion: I pay attention to the flow of thoughts while consciously not minding their character, frequency, or tone. In journaling as in meditation, there is no difference between “good thoughts” and “bad thoughts.” Just as one’s nose makes no distinction between pleasing aromas and noxious ones but instead smells them all, the mind functions by producing a nonstop assortment of cognitive bits, all of which have no direct connection to who or what we “really” are. Thus, a good person can have bad thoughts during meditation; a bad person can have good thoughts. Typically, people have a range of thoughts, good and bad, that coexist despite their contradictions: one minute you love the person sitting next to you; the next minute you’d like to slap them. This isn’t a sign that you are good, bad, crazy, or sane: this is a sign that you are a living, thinking creature. After a while, you come to realize that who we are is, like our thinking, beyond categorization and judgment. Thoughts and the selves who think them are neither good nor bad, they simply exist.
Thus the trick to journaling is to cultivate a nondiscriminating mind: pretty or not, all thoughts deserve to be recorded. And so the brain that thinks becomes intricately and directly connected with the hand that writes; after years of keeping a hand-written journal, in fact, I’ve come to wonder whether I actually think with my hand, not my head. Stashed and saved, today’s random thoughts might come in handy someday, or never. I’d like to think, though, that new thoughts, surprising thoughts, provocative thoughts, and thoughts of astonishing shapes and sizes are more likely to show up on the doorstep of a mind that has made a practice of receiving all thoughts with equanimous hospitality.
Since many blogs (my own included) are nothing more than online journals, blog-reading is a kind of junk-shopping: I’ll show you mine if you show me yours. Like yardsale shoppers, we sift through one another’s castoff dribs and drabs, holding up piece by piece to consider what fits and is appealing. One person’s trash is another person’s treasure, and since we aren’t entirely the same person from moment to moment (our moods as well as our identities changing and transmuting over time, as subtle as billowing smoke), our sense of what is necessary and precious gradually evolves. Thus the scrap I stash in my junk drawer today–an incomplete pack of cards, a handful of used batteries, a tape measure, an old magazine–might tomorrow hold some special merit or memory, offering a use or application that never previously suggested itself. In a word, you never know, and as my mother always says, it’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. My mother’s drawers, of course, are particularly junky; in my case, it is my notebook, not my drawer, where I save both hidden hurts and surprising joys.
- This entry and the accompanying photos are my contribution to the Photo Friday topic “Junk.”
Apr 23, 2004 at 12:20 pm
You’ve really outdone yourself with this one, Dr. Schaub (I just love hearing it out loud!). Your writing is always good, and often great, and sometimes even extraordinary. Today your writing went much further than that; such perfection is rarely attained, yet you make it seem effortless.
As I was reading, there were so many places that I wanted to give you a high-five, or at least a hearty hoorah, or sometimes a knowing nod. You captured our junk exquisitely, and I thank you for sharing this slice of the pieces of you that are also the pieces of me. Exactly.
You’re right — you just never know. Well, except I know this piece of writing should see a wider audience, and begs to be published. Your junk is our treasure, indeed.
LikeLike
Apr 23, 2004 at 12:36 pm
I couldn’t agree more with ntexas99’s comments, and I can’t say it better. Thanks again for another great read!
LikeLike
Apr 23, 2004 at 2:23 pm
Lorianne, I found myself thinking along similar lines this morning, though not nearly so eloquently. Thank you for this, as usual, well-crafted post.
LikeLike
Apr 23, 2004 at 7:28 pm
I came back to make sure it wasn’t a caffeine induced euphoria, or leftover twinkling stars still in my eyes, or some other outside source that made me love this one so very much.
Nope. It REALLY is that good.
You know you’ve read something that lives and breaths when you read it and simultaneously become insanely jealous and overwhelmingly awed at the same time. This kind of writing makes me want to turn my junk drawers out on the floor for all to see.
If blogs were people (and aren’t they?), then this particular blog entry is MY HERO. I will be back to inhale deeply again and again, I’m sure.
LikeLike
Apr 23, 2004 at 8:50 pm
Ah, yes, but if you are going to share your writing, you DO have to be discriminating, particularly on the web where you are sharing your thoughts with people you do not know.
Admit weakness, and it will be used against you.
After all, at some point, your heartwrenching confession that, for example, you suffered from depression WILL someday reappear as someone uses your admission of such to disregard your thoughts as the result of distorted thinking.
The sad thing is, not that people will do this sort of thing, but that some of the people who will do it will be people who have called you a ‘friend.’
My advice is write freely in private, but censor yourself publicly. And never admit a fault, a flaw, or a weakness. Never.
LikeLike
Apr 24, 2004 at 12:39 pm
ntexas99, I’m blushing (doubly) from *both* of your comments. Wow. I’m happy to hear you enjoyed the post, and a bit humbled (actually, a lot humbled) by your response. Good thing I don’t know where you live or I’d have to show up on your doorstep like an affection-starved puppy looking for more gushing praise… 😉
(It goes to prove, again, that one person’s junk is another person’s treasure, doesn’t it? When we’re *writing* something, we’re really in no place to judge it rightly, so we should write it *all* down.)
Judith, thanks for the kind comment. I’m happy to hear you’re enjoying the posts!
Kurt, I skipped on over to the Coffee Sutras after getting your comment, and your entry there raised exactly the same points as mine. Funny how these synchronicities seem to happen all the time in the blogosphere. (Something about great minds working alike, I think?) 😉
Tonio, you raise an entirely valid point (as always!) about publication & self-censorship. When I first starting keeping a blog, I knew that I wouldn’t be able to write about *everything*: as a professor, for example, I have to maintain a certain professional code of ethics in terms of how I talk about students, and as I wife I’d be in trouble if I impinged too severely on Chris’s privacy. At some point someone told me not to write anything that I wouldn’t want *EVERYONE* to see, and although I’ve pushed that envelope a great deal at times, that general guideline is always at the back of my head.
I’m not sure I *totally* agree about never admitting weakness: my initial response is that if I didn’t talk about my weaknesses, I’d have very little to talk about. 😉 But, I agree that anyone (friend or enemy) can take one’s words out of context & then use them to nefarious ends. In this “Ashcroft age,” the usual artistic freedoms we might take for granted are even more problematized.
Thanks to each & all for stopping by & taking the time to comment.
LikeLike
May 2, 2004 at 1:18 pm
I’ve kept an online diary (my URL) for a little over two years now… And you’re right, it’s very eclectic. You wonder what the hell you were thinking, some days. But I never really thought of it the way you described it. I read through it and thought, “Why did I write this down? It’s worthless! It means nothing! Jeez…” But you made me appreciate all the meaningless drivel that I have in there.
LikeLike
May 8, 2004 at 5:07 pm
Hi, Jess–thanks for commenting, and apologies for my delay in responding: I’ve been buried in end-of-term grading, a different kind of “junk”! 😉
Yeah, most of what we write is “meaningless,” except to us, of course. Sometimes I go back & re-read stuff I scribbled years ago, and it’s funny to see how far I’ve come in some ways & how nothing’s changed in others! But, the practice of writing itself is transformative, I think: you have to scribble lots of junk to unearth the gems that are hidden underneath, the stuff you’d never think of saying unless you were sitting there babbling incoherently with pen in hand.
Those gems make the junk worth it. Without the courage to face the junk, the gems would never surface.
Thanks again for commenting, and I hope you’re doing well!
LikeLike
Nov 7, 2004 at 1:12 pm
I came upon your entry while I was searching for the elusive Virginia Woolf quote you mention above. After searching in net in vain, I unearthed my old grad school writing anthologies, and found it! Here it is:
“What sort of diary should I like mine to be? Something loose knit and yet not slovenly, so elastic that it will embrace anything, solemn, slight or beautiful that comes into my mind. I should like it to resemble some deep old desk, or capacious hold-all, in which one flings a mass of odds and ends without looking them through. (1919)
(From _A Writer’s Diary_.)
LikeLike
Nov 20, 2004 at 3:32 pm
Sue, thanks so much for tracking down the original source of that quote! I love Woolf but haven’t read *A Writer’s Diary*, so I guess you just gave me a good reason to find a copy!
LikeLike