Make no bones about it: if you’re squeamish about Buddha statues and other overt examples of Buddhist iconography, the Providence Zen Center is the kind of place that will make you (repeatedly) lose your lunch.
One of the things we talked about at this weekend’s Kwan Um School of Zen Dharma Teacher retreat was the eye-popping Buddhist art that can be found in our Korean-influenced Zen Centers. Since most of the folks who practice in our School weren’t raised as Buddhists, these colorful cultural trappings can be very off-putting to newcomers. As someone who was raised Catholic and was “born again” in college, I came to Zen with something of a Christian double-whammy. The first time I walked into a Zen Center and saw a huge gold statue looking back at me, every fiber in my good little Catholic-turned-evangelical soul was screaming protestations: “No! Not an idol! Run away, sister, and repent!”
Apparently I’m not the only one who had (and eventually overcame) such a vehement first reaction. During his presentation on Buddhist iconography, Zen Master Dae Kwang, himself raised as a corn-fed Nebraskan Presbyterian, recounted how another Dharma teacher used to come to the Zen Center every morning for 5 am bows and then would immediately go to a church around the corner to pray for forgiveness. “Three of the Ten Commandments,” Zen Master Dae Kwang explained, “forbid idols and idolatry. That’s how much God hates gold statues!” God’s distaste for devotional art notwithstanding, the Providence Zen Center is chock-full of scarily exotic statues, altars, and other iconographic tchotchkes, so any Zen Center resident or Dharma teacher necessarily has to spend a lot of time doing damage control when freaked-out Christians, Jews, or Muslims gingerly set foot into a Zen Center for the first time.
So, here’s the skinny on all those Buddha statues: they aren’t idols. Although you’ll see Zen-heads bowing in front of such statues, you’ll also see us bowing to our meditation mats, and to our food, and to one another. Bowing is simply a sign of respect, a sort of Buddhist “pleased to meet you.” Although there have been times on retreat when I’ve felt like worshipping my food, that isn’t why I bow to my bowls before digging into an eaten-in-silence meal. Bowing is a physical sign of both humility and interdependence, an acknowledgment that our individual selves aren’t separate from the rest of the universe. When a Buddhist bows upon entering a Dharma room, they bow as a sign of gratitude to the silent practice energy of that place. The room isn’t a god to be worshipped, and neither is the statue that’s found in that room.
Instead, the purpose of Buddha statues, altar paintings, and other iconographic images is purely symbolic. Representations of the the historical Buddha, the Buddha’s heavenly incarnations, and various other mythic characters are designed to point inward, not outward. Meditating in front of a Buddha statue, a Zen-head isn’t worshipping much less praying to that statue. Instead, a Buddha statue is a physical symbol of one’s own true, compassionate nature. The historical Buddha never claimed to be a god; instead, his teachings point to the fact that everyone has a latent ability to wake up and realize their true connection to all beings. Like a sports-crazed kid who covers his bedroom walls with posters of Shaquille O’Neal, Buddhists simply surround themselves with images of someone they want to be like. Buddhists don’t worship the Buddha any more than sports fans worship Shaq or Lutherans worship Martin Luther. The flesh-and-blood man who earned the title Buddha simply showed one way of waking up. Statues and paintings of that man and his various mythic counterparts simply point to the need to enact that way for oneself.
If all these Buddha statues are simply symbolic, why have them at all? There certainly are religions (Quakerism being one) that eshew all religious trappings in favor of a bare-bones approach. For all of Zen’s emphasis on spiritual minimalism, it still derives from a visually rich tradition. True, Buddha statues, altars, candles, and incense aren’t necessary: it’s entirely possible to meditate and gain enlightenment without any of these fancy accoutrements. By the same token, though, we as embodied creatures rely on our senses to steer our thoughts and emotions. Separated from our family, we cherish photographs that remind us of our loved ones even though we technically don’t need such reminders. Although it’s possible to get romantic without candlelight and flowers, sometimes we need a sensory nudge to get us in the mood. At times, sitting Zen can feel no different than waiting for the bus: it’s easy to zone out and let one’s mind wander. A gleam of candlelight on gold or a whiff of wafting incense can serve as a powerful reminder: this room is special because this moment is unique. This truth applies everywhere at all times, but sometimes we need additional physical reminders.
Long-time Zen practitioners often use the term “Dharma candy” to refer to all the fancy Asian accoutrements that tease the eyes and senses of Zen Center visitors. Truth be told, meditation is boring. If we expected newcomers to sit following their breath in an unfurnished cinder block basement, we’d probably get very few repeat customers. As much as many Westerners recoil at the “smells and bells” of Buddhist practice, exoticism nevertheless has a huge appeal. Like candy, enormous statues and looming pagodas have very little nutritional value spiritually speaking. Simply looking at a Zen temple won’t earn you any karmic points; instead of snacking on candy, you have to dig into an entree called practice. But if the sight of a lovely Asian temple nestled in changing trees provides a sweet enough taste, perhaps you’ll be tempted to stay for an entire meal. Meditation can be bitter medicine, and devotional art serves as a spoonful of sugar. When your mind wanders during meditation, chanting, or bows, there is something colorful and interesting to focus your attention on. A peaceful Zen Center filled with beautiful things points to the special quality of one’s True Nature. Yes, enlightenment is no different from ordinary life, but at the same time it is special. Precisely because enlightenment can happen anywhere at anytime, we set aside special, extraordinarily lovely places to remind ourselves of that fact.
One of the intrinsic paradoxes of Zen practice is that it is simultaneously iconographic and iconoclastic. One famous Zen story recounts how an impoverished monk chopped and then burned his temple’s wooden Buddha to keep warm: when push comes to shove, fueling the practice fire is more important than devotional formalities. At the same time, though, Zen-heads are meticulously careful about tending their altars and practice spaces: how you keep your altar is how you keep your mind. Whether made of gold, wood, or stone, a Buddha statue is like your mind: efficacious only if you pay attention. Left to its own devices, a stone Buddha will collect dust like any other inanimate object: left to its own devices, a stone Buddha has no inherent power. The power of any iconographic symbol lies entirely in the eye of the beholder; although a sign can point you home, only your own legs can get you there.
Oct 19, 2004 at 4:08 am
Goodness, Lorianne. This was amazing. I won’t elaborate here, but I needed that post. Thank you. I’m humbled by how beautifully you put things, and how clearly.
(And, while I’m hear, I just wanted to say that I adore that lower laughing picture of you. It’s so intimate, and yet somehow coy, as if you’re giggling at us for being so captured something as silly as a photo.)
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 8:44 am
I can’t just read this post without commenting that this was the clearest explanation of the iconography of Buddhism I’ve ever read. You should spin this one out into a *paid* article. ๐
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 12:23 pm
Siona, I’m so glad you found this post helpful in whatever way for whatever reason. And yeah, I like that photo too, if I do say so myself. I’m always laughing/giggling at the damnedest times for entirely inappropriate reasons. That pic kinda captures that.
So, Gary, what would *you* be willing to pay for this article? ๐
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 2:48 pm
There’s a prof at a local evangelical seminary who sends his students off to visit services of other faiths. They come to our sangha every once in a while for Sunday night puja, in twos or threes. They’re pretty easy to recognize, and I always try to get to them before the bowing starts so I can explain what it means. That’s the piece that really gives them the horrors. If they see that while they have fixed in their heads that we worshipping statues, the chances of them understanding what we actually do, and why, dwindle to near zero.
They’re all well-behaved (they have strict instructions just to observe; no trying to convert). Most respect what we’re doing, although of course almost all of them think we’re fundamentally misguided. But there’s a couple every year who are horrified, who clearly feel that they’ve walked into a viper’s nest. To these people we fall into a category roughly equivalent to “demonically possessed.” They’re very careful to keep their backs to the walls and their eyes on a clear path to the door, lest we seize them and drag them downstairs to where we perform our horrible sacrifices.
An odd feeling, to engender that kind of horror.
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 3:39 pm
This post is both wonderfully enlightening and somehow equally daunting. I’m just not disciplined enough for Buddhism. I can tell. Plus, I love Guinness, occasional gambling, and getting into trouble.
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 6:57 pm
psst. Shane, c’mon over to the Tibetan bunch. We’re not nearly so disciplined. We’re noisy. We spill food and drink in the shrine room. We shift and scratch during meditation. We jumble all kinds of junk up on the shrine.
(I doubt there’s any truth to it, particularly, but we’re convinced that we’re the Buddhists in America who know how to party.)
But — getting slightly more serious — this business of “I’m not disciplined enough” — I hear it from lots of people. I’m not disciplined enough either. Hell, even Lorianne isn’t disciplined enough, and she’s way better than I am. If we were already disciplined enough, then what would we practice for? I practice *because* I’ve got no discipline and I’m lazy and given to all sorts of low pleasures and intoxications. You have to start somewhere. Buddhism would be pretty worthless if it only worked for people who didn’t need it.
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2004 at 8:36 pm
Shane (and Dale), I’m not disciplined AT ALL, and I love getting into trouble, too. This weekend, mention was made to the Buddhist concept of the “5 desires.” Somehow thinking there had to be more than only *5*, I asked what they were. The answer: fame, fortune, food, sex, and sleep. “Hmmmm,” I answered. “I’m all about *all* of those!” If I were disciplined and enlightened “for real,” I wouldn’t need to practice. And compared to hard-core Japanese schools, my Korean school is laid back & lazy: in fact, someone mentioned how other “stricter” Zen schools think my school is a “joke” because we are gentle with new folks & don’t get “heady” about the tradition.
Dale, you said it was an “odd feeling, to engender that kind of horror.” Hmmm, you must not have ever taught college, or maybe you’ve simply forgotten? ๐ I can only imagine the number of evangelicals there are who are now praying for your eternal soul. I wonder if that’s a good or a bad thing?
LikeLike
Oct 20, 2004 at 7:54 am
Oh, a good thing, definitely. I’ll take all the help I can get ๐
LikeLike
Oct 20, 2004 at 1:32 pm
Funny you mentioned Catholicism like a Catholic would have a hard time with gaudy statuary. Not where I came from! I thought Protestants were the ones who accused the Catholics of idolatry with all their statuary. Don’t you have any bathtub Virgins around Keene?! It may depend on the ethnicity – the Irish Catholic church I went to was pretty tame, the French Canadians were a step up, then the Polish, and the Italians probably had the most elaborate statuary. But none of them have anything on the Mexicans for religious kitsch (said as the Day of the Dead approaches).
LikeLike
Oct 20, 2004 at 2:27 pm
Amen to that, Dale. If the fundies are praying for me ’cause I’m hopelessly lost, I would agree. We *both* need all the help we can get!
Leslee, you’d *think* that being raised as an Italian/Irish Catholic would inure me to religious statuary…but non-Christian statues are a different matter entirely. There’s something about the fact that the statues are *golden* (like the golden calf), plus the fact that they’re Buddhas, not Christian saints. I guess I was raised with a double-standard: a statue of Mary on a Half Shell is godly, but a garden Buddha is idolatrous. It makes no sense, but the distinction is there on a subconscious level.
LikeLike
Oct 20, 2004 at 7:56 pm
Lorianne, read Hilary Mantel’s novel, “Fludd” for an interesting take on Britian in the early 1960’s and the removal of the statues from a small provincial church after Vatican II. The heart goes out of the parish when the statues are removed by the over-zealous Bishop who feels they are idolatry. The parish falls to pieces while they are gone, but a mysterious stranger appears and the plot is set into action.
Anyway, your post reminded me of it!
LikeLike
Oct 21, 2004 at 12:29 pm
Loretta, I’ve never heard of *Fludd*, but I’ll add it to my list of must-reads. When we moved to New England from the Midwest, I’d been working for a progressive Catholic parish, and my co-workers warned me that New England/Boston Catholicism was much more “old school” than what I was used to. And they were right: there was a huge culture shock coming to a place where there were no altar girls, parishioners refused to take Communion from lay eucharistic ministers, etc. The biggest shock was when I set foot in “Sacred Hearts” parish in Malden, MA. First, I didn’t “get” the reference to sacred *hearts*: as far as I knew, Jesus had only *one* heart! (I soon learned the “hearts” referred to Jesus’s and *Mary’s* hearts.) Second, the plaster statues in the church basement were painted in bright (to my eye, gaudy) colors. I’d never seen anything like it…and it *did* seem a bit idolatrous to me! So you don’t even need to leave your own religion to get shaken up by unfamiliar iconography.
LikeLike
Oct 22, 2004 at 7:38 pm
Your comments on incorporating idols into worship was very well written. I find that even though spirituality is a very personal path, the religious community someone chooses or the way a religion is viewed depends a lot on the way someone has explained it.
LikeLike
Oct 23, 2004 at 11:50 am
Hi, Nicole: great to “meet” you! Yes, it’s very important to be able to explain one’s religious beliefs clearly. I think a lot of folks get “turned off” religion because they encounter people who aren’t very clear in how they describe their own practices.
That being said, I’d never describe what I do as “incorporating idols into worship.” These Buddha images are statues, not idols, and I don’t worship them. They simply are visual reminders of abstract concepts: a kind of external focal point.
Thanks for taking the time to comment!
LikeLike