After no pregnancies, an appendectomy when I was eighteen, and several months without my accustomed yoga/Pilates and belly-dancing classes, my stomach at 38 looks closer to Zhoen’s at 45 than Leslee’s at 48. In an era when super-models are emphatic exclamations, the women in my family have always been shaped like inverted question marks: small on top and curvy at bottom. (Hat tip to Dave, who once on-blog or off- used this punctuation analogy to describe his preferred feminine body type.) Although at insecure, mirror-scrutinizing moments I crave Abs of Steel as much as any girly-girl, at 38 I’ve come to realize I’m constitutionally Soft in the Middle, just like the nugat-filled candy bars I relished as a kid…and which now go straight to my stomach, butt, and thighs.
In terms of pop culture, I’m more JLo than Lohan, more Beyonce than Tyra. If you’re old enough to remember Madonna’s pre-Pilates “Holiday,” you know that she, too, was once softer than her current well-chiseled bod would suggest. I suppose if I ate less, worked out more, and generally made it a point to become an exclamation point, I too could have a flat and well-toned tum…but what precisely is the point? My belly’s soft because it’s flexible, expanding and contracting with every meal and every breath. Would I want to have a taut and sleek figure if it meant living a life that’s constricted in several senses of the term? Or do I love living a life that relishes food, luxuriates in laughter, and appreciates the way meditation encourages you to let it all hang out as your belly rises and falls with every breath?
Although I’m not tall, blonde, or busty, I’m slender enough that I could, in theory, have a Barbie Body if I worked hard enough…but I’m not enamored with working hard. Why would I want to work hard to be hard? Rock-hard abs are, in the end, rock hard: isn’t it enough that life itself is hard? Allowing myself a little bit of softness in the middle, I think, is the seat of compassion: allowing myself a little bit of slack and sag means I needn’t demand perfection in others, either. If old peeling paint has a certain appeal, why can’t beauty be a belly that has learned to go with the gravitational flow rather than insisting on being perpetually and unnaturally tight? Isn’t there a reason, after all, that we call an obnoxiously rigid person a tight ass?
These days as my belly gently rounds and sags, I’ve come to adore the line in the Song of Songs where the speaker describes his lover’s belly as looking like a heap of wheat set about by lilies: a round and even somewhat dumpy lump whose softness presages a garden of delights nearby. These days, telling someone their stomach looks like a heap of wheat would earn you a slap…but for the herd-keeping Israelites, wheat was a precious commodity, and a heap of it was as precious as gold. Barbie’s well-toned tum bears the price of plastic: hard currency that’s a dime a dozen. Those of us who have made peace with our inverted question marks know that booty is a stash of precious goods, there being something more valuable than junk in this trunk.
They say a mind is a terrible thing to waste, and I’d go a step further. Those nugat-filled candy bars I relished as a kid were unspeakably sweet, and so is the wisdom that knows a waist is a terrible thing to mind.
- If you want to join the Belly Roll, shoot a picture of your bare stomach, post it to your blog, and tell Mella that she inspired you.
Mar 13, 2007 at 10:32 am
Brava! Soft is beautiful – and really isn’t a question mark always more intriguing than an exclamation point anyway? One invites curiosity, the other demands attention.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 10:57 am
Oh you brave (skinny) woman π
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 11:04 am
Mella, I love this idea that question marks invite curiosity whereas exclamation marks demand attention. I guess my low-maintenance figure points to the fact that I’m not a very high-maintenance person.
That Girl, it’s all relative, isn’t it? One woman’s soft is another woman’s skinny. I’m sure we all have body parts we wish we could change (mine are my legs), so the secret, I think, is in figuring out (and appreciating) our best parts, outer or inner.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 11:33 am
Either that or a personal trainer and liposuction LOL
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 11:34 am
Yeah, but either of those options involves PAIN, and I’m too lazy for that. π
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 2:10 pm
I call that a Bathsheba belly. π
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 4:21 pm
I wouldn’t dare. After 3 babies and years of not working out at all, I am way too soft in the middle. Actually, I could pass for 8 mos. pregnant (with twins).
Just remember that the soft-in-the-middle of age 38 gets to be the 8 mos. pregnant at 60+ if you don’t do something to stop the progression.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 5:09 pm
That does sound like something I would say.
Funny, I only ever thought it was men who had belly-comparing contests. Though we have to be drunk first. And bragging rights go to the one with the *biggest* belly – at least out here in flyover land.
Speaking of “heap of wheat,” one of the things I like about the old-time blues is the range of endearments: bluesmen sang about their “pigmeat mamas” and their “milkcows.” And those were *compliments*.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 5:52 pm
I love “Bathsheba belly”: that’s right in line with belly-dancing, isn’t it! Although I’ve currently fallen off the belly-dancing wagon, I’ll plan to resume classes in the summer…and I start back with yoga tomorrow. So being soft doesn’t have to correspond with being out of shape.
So, Dave, how many belly-bragging contests have you won? Or does the drunkenness mean you don’t remember the results afterward? π
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 6:42 pm
I think you are beautiful. That’s a lovely belly. I’ll take a soft inviting tum over a six-pack any day.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 6:55 pm
This is a new and different take on navel-gazing.
(Please don’t take that the wrong way. I’ve been a faithful reader for years, but I just couldn’t resist.)
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 7:13 pm
Oh, you go girl. You do have a belly dancer’s belly.
LikeLike
Mar 13, 2007 at 7:27 pm
Personally, I think I’d prefer to drink a six-pack than have a six-pack, if you know what I mean. (Although in my case, I’d never be able to consume a six-pack in a single sitting…)
Rebecca, I love your comment about navel-gazing: yes, that’s it exactly! You have to have a relaxed belly to meditate properly…maybe that’s what I love about belly-dancing?
Leslee, I think the resemblance to a “real” belly-dancer disappears as soon as I start moving…but I’ll savor the compliment anyway. π
LikeLike
Mar 14, 2007 at 10:25 am
Your belly’s lovely, and I love Rebecca’s comment about navel gazing!
LikeLike
Mar 14, 2007 at 5:29 pm
Or do I love living a life that relishes food, luxuriates in laughter, and appreciates the way meditation encourages you to let it all hang out as your belly rises and falls with every breath?
What a wonderful way to phrase and frame this. Yes, yes, and a thousand times yes.
This is especially valuable to me after several days among family in my former hometown, where the obsession with thinness takes on almost a religious character. Some of the people in my life genuinely believe I will be happy and healthy only if I refrain from eating foods which are “bad” and which “sabotage” my health…and your post is a much-needed counterpoint to that way of thinking about embodiment.
LikeLike
Mar 15, 2007 at 12:37 pm
I would also rather drink a six pack than have a six pack!
I do enjoy working out…if I didn’t, I wouldn’t. I like the extra stamina. That is essential when you have a toddler with the energy of a sugar molecule.
LikeLike
Mar 16, 2007 at 11:47 am
THANK YOU! This post is inspiring and I love your honesty and openness!:)
LikeLike
Mar 16, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Amen
LikeLike