It is the nature of academic conferences that you have lots of “Gee-whiz, let me write that down” insights…but those “a-ha moments” that sit you bolt-upright in your seat are rarer and more precious.
This morning, at the very end of the Q&A portion of Orion Magazine’s plenary panel on “The New, New Environmental Writing” featuring David Gessner, Ginger Strand, and Jordan Fisher Smith, Ginger Strand make a remark that brought into crystal-clear focus what I’ve been trying to do for the past three-plus years on Hoarded Ordinaries. In noting what’s good about the “old” nature writing of a writer like Henry David Thoreau, Strand said it was his “sustained attention” to lived experience: his life, the world around him, his ever-active mind.
It was that phrase “sustained attention” that zinged me like a lightening bolt…and that phrase also resonated with a Keene State colleague who sat next to me during this morning’s plenary panel. If my sometimes-personal blogging about place isn’t about sustained attention, I don’t know what it’s about.
On Saturday morning, I’m participating in a session titled “Grass Roots, Web Logs, and Virtual Moss? An Ecocritical Look at Blogging.” The presentation title I’d proposed is “The Personal Is Ecological: Locating the Self in Place-based Weblogs,” and I’ve been struggling all week with what to say on Saturday. What I want to talk about is the way that many so-called place-bloggers actually focus as much on so-called “personal” matters as they do on so-called “environmental” ones: in my mind, the line between “nature writing” and “personal writing” is hopelessly blurred on blogs such as mine, and I consider that a good thing.
What I’ve been struggling with, though, is with finding language to explain why I think it’s a good thing to blend “the personal” with “the environmental.” In my vague grappling toward articulation, I’ve reasoned that habitats consist of particular places combined with communities of interconnected creatures, so blogs that ground a specific person in a particular place are “ecological” in depicting these interconnections. But until Ginger Strand uttered the worlds “sustained attention,” I didn’t have a narrative “hook” to hang my intellectual “hat” upon.
Like several of the participants in today’s Orion Magazine panel (most memorably David Gessner, who addresses this very issue in his book Sick of Nature), I resist the “nature writer” mantle. Yes, I mention birds, trees, and other natural things here…but I show just as many pictures of pick-up trucks, graffiti-covered walls, and other human-made objects. In selecting a masthead image for this newly formated version of Hoarded Ordinaries, in fact, I intentionally chose one with bricks. Yes, there’s some leafy green foliage at the top of my new blog-home, but the leafy-green left is juxtaposed against a brick red right. Here’s the place, ladies and gentlemen, where “nature” meets “culture” and “place” is something “personal.”
As David Gessner listed the kinds of things he wishes he could see more of in so-called “nature writing”–references to booze, shit, and machines, written by people who have real-world jobs and aren’t “white guys from Harvard”–I kept thinking of the place-bloggers I read and know: folks with whom I’ve actually drank and shot the shit. The “New, New Environmental Writing”–prose that breaks free of the “gentle strait-jacket of genre” that Gessner decries–is being written and read…it just isn’t necessarily found in the “quiet magazines” that Gessner claims to be so sick of. “We’re here,” I wanted to shout from the back of Wofford College’s Leonard Auditorium, “but we aren’t writing and publishing in the places you’re looking!” Panelist Jordan Fisher Smith pinpointed the precise reason why conventionally published nature writing–the stuff you read in books and quiet magazines–is so homogenous: as a product sold primarily to urban audiences, nature writing is marketed as “epiphanies from pretty places,” and much of what place-bloggers such as Dave and Beth and Fred are offering isn’t always pretty or neatly epiphanic.
I find it hugely ironic that the name of the journal Gessner founded, Ecotone, is the same as the now-defunct place-bloggers wiki were I first found my feet as an online writer. There already is a community of “new, new voices” who are writing and publishing genre-defying nature writing…we just tend to fly under the conventional market radar. Because we deliver our writing straight to our audiences without the middle-men of journals, agents, book publishers, and the like, we can push the usual generic boundaries, offering “nature writing” that is sometimes pretty, sometimes dirty, and always personal. What remains constant, regardless of what we call the writing on our blogs, is the process of how we produce it. Whether I’m blogging a conference in South Carolina or the graffiti-covered factories in my neighborhood back in New Hampshire, what I do when I sit down to write is try to pay Sustained Attention to where I am.
Jun 14, 2007 at 1:14 pm
Interesting discussion. I like the thought of “sustained attention.”
I have been interested lately in the “genre” known as the “familiar essay.” Are you familiar with those.
I’ve joined you, and others, at wordpress. Twoblueday.wordpress.com.
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 3:39 pm
What I forgot to mention in my post was the fact that “sustained attention” describes the intersection between my writing practice & my spiritual practice. Zen is all about “sustained attention,” so bringing that practice to my writing, blogging, and environmental sensibility is very important to me.
I’m not familiar with “familiar essays,” although in Googling the term, I guess I write them. š I’m not much into genres and other writing labels: if an essay is good, I don’t much care if you call it “nature writing” or “autobiographical writing” or whatnot. What I look for in an essay, I think, is something real…and that reality can come from actual places, real people, or (preferably!) a mix of both.
Congrats on your move to WordPress. I think you’ll like it here.
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 6:06 pm
Interesting. Do you think having a phrase for it helps or will help you shape your writing or provide focus or…what? You’ve already been doing it anyway. Just curious what naming it does for you. Like being able to identify birds or flowers? – they’re still what they are but having names for them does make a difference to the beholder.
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 7:16 pm
I don’t think having the phrase will change what I do…but I think it helps me think about/clarify what I want to talk about at my panel presentation on Saturday. It’s not like “sustained attention” is an idea I’ve never had before…it was more like being “reminded” of something I’d forgotten, or forgotten how to articulate.
I tend to be a very practical, “just do it” kind of writer, so being on a panel that is going to talk about blogging feels a bit weird to me. I mean, I’ve been blogging some sort of intersection of “place” and “personal” for over three years now, but I still have trouble describing that particular intersection & why I think it’s important.
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 7:18 pm
And yeah…I like the analogy with knowing the name of a bird or flower. It’s as if naming a thing makes it more significant as a valued individual rather than “just another anonymous thing.” So saying “I practice sustained attention” somehow sounds more serious & intentional than “I write stuff.” š
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 7:43 pm
More white porcelain.
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 7:46 pm
White porcelain, or painted glass:
I’m utterly enchanted with the huge magnolias they have here in the south, so I’ll be posting more magnolia pictures tomorrow. They’re just so photogenic!
LikeLike
Jun 14, 2007 at 9:33 pm
Thanks for the mention – it’s awfully nice to be included with Beth and Fred as an example of something. Me, I write about “nature” because I live out in the woods and don’t get into town much. If I lived in town as you do, I’d write about dilapidated old buildings and pickup trucks, no doubt. But I also think it’s important to try and get across some concepts in ecology and conservation from time to time. And as non-specialist bloggers, we have have the advantage of a large general audience; we’re not preaching to the choir. I’m not sure that’s the case with Orion.
As for sustained attention, yes: in poetry too it’s mostly about the quality of attention one brings to the world outside of the poem, before one ever sets pen to page. Everything else is just games with language. If I taught writing (god forbid!), I’d probably focus on trying to get people to see the world in new ways. (And that does NOT have to mean epiphanies! I’m sick of epiphanies.)
Have fun on Saturday. I’m sure you’ll do well.
LikeLike
Jun 15, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Hey, I think John Lane is at Wofford on the English faculty. He edited a volume called something like “new nature writers of the south.” Run into him?
Looking forward to joining you on WordPress soon, you make it look good, daughter.
LikeLike
Jun 15, 2007 at 8:15 pm
[…] ecological research with non-scientists because yesterday morning, after breakfast but before the a-ha moment I experienced at the morning plenary session, I was feeling Conference Overload. In my everyday […]
LikeLike
Jun 17, 2007 at 11:01 am
Nice blog! Thanks for linking to it from the ASLE conference site. And nice pics of those translucent mushrooms that were all over the Wofford campus on Friday morning!
I was also at ASLE. I am a scientist rather than a literary writer, but I appreciate good writing and, as a biologist, the insights into nature that I get from ASLE folks. Thanks for the insights; I’ll certainly be checking back here again!
LikeLike
Jun 19, 2007 at 1:48 pm
[…] were two of the conference participants who presented along with me at the blogging panel I’d mentioned last week; Chas also presented but didn’t join us in our hammock. The blogosphere is a vast […]
LikeLike