Today I received an invitation to join Google+, a social networking site I’d heard various folks mention on Facebook recently. I’m not normally an early adopter of online (or any) technologies: a creature of habit, I typically prefer my old, familiar ways to something strange and newfangled. But since the friend who invited me is someone I know both online and face-to-face–and since this same friend is a “cool kid” who keeps up-to-date with the latest ways of interacting online–I accepted her invitation to join Facebook’s newest competition.
As soon as I connected my Google profile to Google+, however, I had a pang of joiners’ remorse. Already, I feel spread too thin among the various “places” where I maintain an online presence. At any given moment, I share stuff on my blog, on Flickr, on Facebook, and on Twitter. How many more places can I possibly find cool news to post and share, and how many more places do I need to check to see what my cool friends are doing?
Way back in the old days, keeping a blog was all you needed to do to keep in touch with friends both near and far. In the days after my divorce, for instance, one friend used to check my blog every few days just to make sure I was still alive and posting, like keeping an eye on the house of an elderly neighbor for signs of life. Nowadays, though, my blogging friends and I can (and do) go days or even weeks without publishing a proper blog-post, leaving our online footprints on Facebook or Twitter instead.
On any given day, if I want to know how Friend X is doing, checking her or his blog isn’t enough; I also need to check for recent Facebook updates, Flickr photos, or Tweets. Now that Google+ offers another “room” where cool kids can congregate, it might be easier just to call and talk to Friend X to see how she or he is really doing rather than clicking a half different places where such information might be posted.
In this era of smart phones, texting, and Twitter, I feel like a dinosaur when I admit that sometimes I don’t want to “be in touch.” When I was in grad school, for instance, I’d sometimes do research at the public library, figuring no one would think to look for me there rather than the library on campus. The simple fact of leaving campus created the illusion of being out of reach, and I always got more done without the imagined threat of running into my students, colleagues, or friends.
Last month when J and I went to Pittsburgh then Columbus to visit family, I didn’t announce our whereabouts on-blog, on Facebook, or elsewhere: we just went offline like any normal person might have done in the old days, letting our families know when we were arriving while keeping in touch via email with work and school. After we’d arrived in Columbus, however, I realized a high school friend with whom we’d made last-minute dinner plans had mentioned these plans on Facebook, spurring an innocuous but sad-sounding message from another friend whom I hadn’t notified of our trip: “You were in town?” In the age of Facebook and Twitter, simply visiting your family and making Saturday night dinner plans without notifying your entire network of friends can be perceived as a social snub. In the age of Facebook and Twitter, what will happen to the concept of a secret getaway?
My neophyte understanding of Google+ suggests it’s set up so you can sort your contacts into various circles of intimacy, sharing one set of updates with “Friends” and another version of your life with “Family.” This way, if you want to complain about your relatives, in-laws, or coworkers behind their backs, you can conveniently post those gripes in a space where said folks won’t (presumably) see them.
But having blogged under my real name for so long, my posts available for anyone and everyone to see, I’ve learned how to keep to myself any tidbits I don’t want any given relative, in-law, coworker, or friend to see. Instead of relying upon social network circles or online privacy settings to keep my venting rants hidden from those they might hurt, I try to keep most of my obnoxious opinions to myself.
When I was a kid, one oft-repeated saying advised “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.” As cheesy and Pollyanna-like this advice might sound, it’s served as a decent blog philosophy all these years. Instead of rushing to Facebook or Twitter to vent my latest gripe or defend my side in a petty squabble, I keep those opinions to myself, allowing a cooler head to prevail.
To some, this philosophy is tantamount to self-censorship; to me, it’s the making of good writing. Instead of broadcasting a first-draft version of the latest round of “here’s why I’m right,” I’m forced to digest said debate, figuring out a way to write about the issue at hand while preserving the privacy of all involved. This takes a good deal more crafting–and thus is far more artful–than the prevailing philosophy of “If you can’t say something nice, make sure you post your thoughts where only your closest, most like-minded contacts can read them.”
In my online World Literature class, we read a Rumi quatrain which nicely sums up my concerns about the dangers of over-sharing in our Instant-Information Age.
What I most want
is to spring out of this personality,
then to sit apart from that leaping.
I’ve lived too long where I can be reached.
Now that all the cool kids are connecting on Google+, where can an old dinosaur go to find a spot of solitude where she can keep her opinions to herself? Now that all the cool kids are connecting online, can we innovate an even more exotic concept: Google Unplugged?
Click here for more photos of Jonathan Borofsky’s “Walking to the Sky,” which I photographed when J and I were in Pittsburgh last month. If Borofsky’s figures look familiar, it might be because I’ve blogged his work before.
Jul 12, 2011 at 6:49 pm
Well-said, Lorianne.
For my part, I find that I use different online spaces in different ways. I think of blogs, still, as places for longer meditations and musings — and in-depth conversations, sometimes, too. Twitter, Facebook, and G+ are all functionally equivalent for me in a certain way — short pithy updates; a way of checking in with some of my online community if I have a moment to spare but not enough time or mental energy to read or write a blog post. But I’m with you that there are starting to be too many online places to check; I suspect that in time I may stop using FB (if enough people migrate to G+ — I do like the circles notion, not because I want to say secret things about people but because sometimes I want to communicate with a select group of people rather than with everyone.) Who knows.
One way or another, I hear your lament about how difficult it can be to simply unplug these days, for all sorts of reasons, in all sorts of ways.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 7:14 pm
Yes, I think the various “places” can be used for different purposes, but sometimes even that seems too complicated. If I have a photo I want to share, should I “just” post it to Flickr and Facebook, or should I blog it, too? Now that I mainly use my blog for longer posts, I blog far less often, with the smaller bits relegated to Facebook or elsewhere. That’s fine, but sometimes it feels scattered, and I long for integration.
Also, I miss the “old days” when everyone who commented on a post actually commented in the same place, so there was a sense of a larger community all “talking” about the same thing. Now, you have some folks commenting directly on your blog, others commenting on your blog-link on Facebook, and even others commenting on Twitter or (now) G+. It’s easier to publicize your posts, but I don’t like the way your readership becomes fragmented.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 7:24 pm
Yeah, the fragmentation thing is a real PITA. I freely admit my ideal online world is still a federated one where everybody would have their own site, be it a blog or a Tumblr or whatever.
LikeLike
Jul 13, 2011 at 12:46 pm
Dave, I completely agree. What I find myself wanting (for myself and my friends) is one place where all their “stuff” is consolidated. At the moment, Facebook more or less serves this purpose for me: when I post to Flickr or my blog, those post automatically re-post to Facebook, and on the rare occasions when I post to Twitter, I double-post those to Facebook as well. But now I find myself feeling I should re-post all these things to G+ as well, and that I need to keep track of all my friends there, too. I guess I need a “social network feed reader” that would work like Google Reader, but by tracking social network posts rather than blogs.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 7:10 pm
Actually, your “obnoxious opinions” can be nicely saved for sharing over cocktails. But I agree with your well-crafted opinion here about plugging in a little too much. I have resisted getting a smart phone because I want to be unplugged. This was reinforced recently when a friend came to a party and spent much of the time texting people who *weren’t there* instead of interacting with people who were. When I’m with D on weekends, I don’t want either of us (or both) ignoring each other in favor of our smart phones. So I look very unhip with my old flip phone, but for now it does its job as a *phone* however helpful a smart phone may be in certain situations.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 7:20 pm
J and I are looking to upgrade our old-school flip-phones for purely practical reasons: his battery is dying, mine is starting to fail, and I’d like to get a local number. This means we’re contemplating smart phones, but with all the reservations you mention.
I can text on my current phone; I just have no interest in doing it. So if I got a smart phone, I’d like to think (?) I’d enjoy unplugging from it as much as I enjoy occasionally unplugging from my laptop.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 8:27 pm
I hear you. I need to replace mine at some point, too (bad echo, for one thing). Let me know what you guys get. I think T-mobile had some decent plans for relatively infrequent users.
LikeLike
Jul 13, 2011 at 12:48 pm
I’ll let you know what we get, whenever we get around to it…and I’ll definitely share my obnoxious opinions over cocktails, too. J’s current plan is through Verizon, so we’ll presumably stick with them: one less thing to choose.
LikeLike
Jul 12, 2011 at 7:22 pm
Yeah, I’m in the resisting-a-smart-phone crowd, too. I struggle to be even as productive as I am.
It’s not just your cool friends who are on Goggle+, Lorianne. I’m on there, too! 🙂 But really just to look around and try it out. We’ll see what happens once it goes public. If mass adomption occurs, I could well abandon Facebook in its favor, maintaining only an automated presence on FB as I do on Friendfeed, and almost do on Twitter. The cloud-based video conferencing function (“hangouts”) is very attractive to me — I might even get a webcam just to try it out. Sounds like a good venue not only for epic bull sessions but also for all kinds of collaborations and small meetings, including story-telling and the sharing of poems. You know, that old dream of a virtual campfire.
LikeLike
Jul 13, 2011 at 9:23 am
Well said.
I too miss the days when all I had to check was my blog, and it felt like my friends gathered there.
I’m hoping that Google+ will replace twitter and facebook since it sort of incorporates the best features of both. I’m hoping it helps consolidate social networking once everyone migrates over to there. But perhaps that’s unrealistic.
LikeLike
Jul 13, 2011 at 12:54 pm
Dave, you’re definitely one of my coolest friends: in fact, I usually wait until YOU tout some new technology before I adopt it. I haven’t tried any of the real-time collaborative features available through G+, but they sound interesting. It ultimately becomes an issue of time, or lack thereof. Most days I want to spent LESS time online, not more…so having new and different tools to spend time I don’t have ultimately isn’t helpful.
Jo(e), I hear a lot of Facebook/Twitter users saying they’d like to see G+ incorporate (and eventually replace) the best of both worlds, and I suppose in the long run, the online world isn’t big enough for umpteen social network sites. In the meantime, though, while we wait for “survival of the fittest” to happen, I long for integration. It’s tiring to have various versions of “me” in different online places. It feels a bit like living a double or triple life, or more.
LikeLike
Jul 14, 2011 at 1:57 pm
Speaking of integration, or fragmentation, I recently deleted all eleven of my barely-active-anyway blogs. Then I really went crazy and started deleting years worth of writing off my hard drive. I stopped just short of folding up my tent at Facebook.
It felt a bit liberating, and also made me a little sad … or maybe “melancholy” would be a more appropriate choice of descriptor. The up side is that it has given me the space to create something fresh, and new. Not sure yet what that will be, or whether it will live in the blog world, or on Facebook, or G plus, but for the moment, I feel blessedly unplugged. And that’s a good thing.
LikeLike
Jul 14, 2011 at 5:17 pm
The ‘Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind’ from before seems a near impossibility now.
The networks force their adopters into spreading thin, often encouraging duplication if only to ensure that everyone in each of our circles on each of the platforms we’ve adopted gets us.
It’s a world of ‘neither here, nor there’ now!
LikeLike
Jul 15, 2011 at 10:33 am
[…] that we actually need another general-purpose social network — see for example what Lorianne DiSabato and Beth Adams have blogged about it. Here are my initial […]
LikeLike
Jul 16, 2011 at 9:08 am
[…] wrote the following as a comment on a post by Dave which was an addition to posts by Beth and Lorianne reacting to Google+. And thought I might put it here as a post in the hope that someone might come […]
LikeLike
Jul 16, 2011 at 1:08 pm
[…] it was easy enough to get the comment feeds of three of the four posts in question: Lorianne’s post comment feed Dave’s post comment feed My post comment […]
LikeLike
Sep 26, 2012 at 1:28 pm
[…] about J’s and my conscious decision not to buy smartphones: when I step away from my computer, I want to be able to “unplug” entirely. J and I are, however, in the distinct minority; as that CNN article noted, “More people now own […]
LikeLike