Sometimes when I’m bored or feeling uninspired, I’ll page back through my journal to see what I was doing, thinking, or worrying about at a given time in the past. If nothing else, this practice is a great way of cultivating perspective, as I frequently find that something I was completely consumed by even a few months ago is now entirely forgotten and irrelevant.
Last September, I read (and blogged about) David Sedaris’ Theft By Finding, a lightly-edited collection of journal entries from the years 1977 to 2002, and today I rediscovered an observation I’d written in my journal while I was reading the book:
I’m realizing as I read that there are two kinds of journal-keepers: thinkers and recorders. Thinkers write long, sustained entries on a given topics–informal essays on whatever deep thoughts they’re having. Recorders, on the other hand, keep a spontaneous list of whatever thoughts pop into mind as they are writing, jumping from subject to subject as their minds themselves wander.
Thoreau was a thinker, as am I: any given entry sounds like the rough draft of an essay. But equally intriguing is the spontaneous stream-of-consciousness produced by recorders–and Sedaris falls in this category. One minute he notes the cost of eggs at a given diner or the cost of milk at Winn-Dixie, then the next he recounts what drugs he and his sister took on the beach or the slurs passengers in a passing car shouted while pelting him with rocks.
Readers appreciate the profundity of thinkers, but they are sometimes put off by the sheer randomness of recorder-style journals. When a writer simply records his or her thoughts as they occur, it’s sometimes difficult for readers to tell how important any given item or event truly is. Is the price of gas as important as a pending real estate deal or argument with a friend?
What non-writers might not appreciate, however, is the importance of objectivity and impartiality in writing. Most folks would be outraged by an argument or insult, but recorders cultivate a curious kind of equanimity. Viewing everything as grist for the mill allows a recorder to keep a nonchalant account of everything happening in their life. There’s no need to judge or justify what you did, what you saw, or what you thought; just write it down. What results is a refreshingly real depiction of a person’s mind, without censorship or prudery. Over the course of letting oneself think on paper, a recorder develops a sincere and fearless style. Nothing is held back because nothing is shunned.
Theft By Finding is at times wickedly funny, but not because Sedaris is trying to be funny. Instead, the book is funny because Sedaris is entirely deadpan in his account of absurd behavior. The down-and-out people he encounters in Chicago and Raleigh behave in absurd and ridiculous ways, and he reports what they say and what they do in a nonchalant tone as if there is nothing remarkable or disturbing about it.
There are plenty of people who say they’ve seen enough crazy shit to fill a book, but they don’t ever actually write that shit down. David Sedaris is wickedly funny because he simply records the absurd things he sees and overhears without judgement. The stories and scraps of stories he records speak for themselves, without the need for commentary or critique.
Jan 7, 2018 at 6:36 am
Now I’m wondering if I’m a recorder or a thinker? I’m thinking that I’m a bit of both. However, I’ve not had unbiased feedback on this. Would be good to get an outsiders perspective on the small bits of entries I’ve written over time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jan 7, 2018 at 7:40 am
I think we’re all a combination of both, and it can sometimes change over time. In my case, I noticed the difference between my style and Sedaris’ style, so reading other writers’ journals can be enlightening. Ultimately, though, it doesn’t matter which style you are: the whole point of journaling, after all, is to write how *you* are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jan 10, 2018 at 5:25 pm
–
Love! Love! Love!
for the length-N-breadth
of infinite eternity:
Seventh-Heaven
is FULLA love forever;
we cannot be without
the flagrant passion,
the intimate infatuation,
the total warmth,
The Steadfast Lover,
The Rock-Solid-Treasure,
The Instant VitSee,
never alone again.
How do I know?
Im an NDE, child.
And, yes, we CAN
have sex in Heaven;
kinda difficult to have
sex in the Abyss of Misery
when you’re enveloped
in flame for eternity, huh?
Google+: kold_kadavr_ flatliner
LikeLike
Mar 29, 2018 at 11:49 pm
Simply record | Hoarded Ordinaries
[…]Ritchie also reported experiencing another trait of Jesus: love.[…]
LikeLike